SUBMIT NOW

Description:

  • Submitted abstracts will be evaluated and the top 10 posters (10 for students; 10 for dentists) will be announced as the finalists who will be entitled to present during the conference in front of Judges. Three of which will be the winners: 1st Place, 2nd Place, and 3rd Place.
  • The allotted time of presentation will be five minutes for Summary and 2 minutes for Q&A from the judges.
  • Only submitting author will present and get a certificate.
  • Non-confirmation of author to present on the specified time will disqualify his/her nomination and will be replaced by the next ranking candidate.
  • Electronic poster or E-Poster is similar to traditional paper poster but displayed on a large LCD television screen. This is not a paper/printed poster. It will be viewed at the E-Poster Stations throughout the conference.
  • Each E-Poster must be submitted as a single page PDF document with a size of 3840 pixels (Height) x 2160 pixels (Width) in Vertical/Portrait Orientation

Eligibility:

  • Author must be in the dental field, either a Dental Student, Intern, Graduate Student, General Dentist, Dental Specialists, Dental Hygienist, Dental Assistants, or Dental Laboratory Technicians.
  • Dental students, interns, and dental auxiliaries can apply for E-poster presentation award for students, while general dentists and dental specialists can apply to E-poster presentation award for dentists.

Abstract Submission Rules:

  • Author must be SDS Active Member by January 2025
  • Abstracts must be submitted via the online abstract submission portal only.
  • Abstracts must be submitted with the formatting as stipulated in these Guidelines or they will not be accepted: The abstract format must include: Title, Objectives, Methods, Results (data and statistical analysis [where appropriate] and Conclusions. Abstract format for clinical case presentation (CCPA) must include: Title, Introduction, Case description, Discussion, Conclusion/Clinical significance.
  • Abstract should be submitted with blinding of authors’ names and institutions.
  • Abstracts will be reviewed as submitted by the abstract deadline. No changes to the abstract text, including correcting typographical errors, incorrect data, etc. will be permitted after this date
  • Authors may submit up to 2 abstracts but present only 1 abstract (e.g. 1 abstract as presenting author and other abstract as co-author)
  • If the submitter chooses an irrelevant specialty, the Committee will adjust the specialty accordingly. (e.g. Endodontics, Periodontics, etc.)
  • If the submitter chooses an irrelevant category, the Committee may ask the author to resubmit the abstract to the accurate category.
  • Submitting the same abstract by two different authors will cause excluding of both
  • Submitting the same abstract to two different awards will cause excluding of both.
  • Agreement form should be signed from other authors, otherwise will not be accepted
  • Abstracts of unfinished research will not be evaluated.
  • Previously published abstracts (in print or any electronic format) or those presented at another meeting are not allowed.
  • The submitting author must disclose any personal or co-author potential conflict of interest.
  • A plagiarized abstract is disqualified.
  • The Abstract content must meet the standard of an academic/scientific presentation.
  • For abstracts selected as Finalists, PowerPoint presentation (PPT) should be submitted within 2 weeks from the date of the acceptance email. Delay in submission of the presentation may result in cancellation.
  • For any accepted abstract, the poster format previously submitted in JPG/PNG/PDF format will be used for poster display for the duration of the event. Any updated poster should be submitted within 2 weeks from the date of the acceptance email.

Ethical Guidelines:

  • Authorship – Submitted cases should be of the clinician’s original work, and properly documented.  Student or Resident Authors should have submitted cases approved by the Training Center Director and Case Supervisor/s.
  • Ethical Approvals (IRB)– Case Reports should be conducted in full accordance with ethical principles, evidence based guidelines, dental health code and abide with local laws and regulations